Tony Novak profile picture
  "AskTony" column archive        


Categories

Most Popular

AskTony Archive

This Web site contains a compilation of more than a thousand consumer finance  columns written by Tony Novak from the 1980s through 2006, updated and reformatted for maximum usefulness today.  New material was added after 2010.

Content is the opinion of the author and does not represent the position of any other person or entity. Information is from sources believed to be reliable but cannot be guaranteed.

The author is paid for product endorsements and has an ownership or other financial interest in the businesses related to the topics covered.

New questions

Submit consumer finance questions at OnlineAdviser.org and health insurance questions at OnlineNavigator.org

Sponsored by:

FreedomBenefits.net Insurance Exchange - your source of valuable information on state and federal health reform benefits.

Core Health Insurance - America's favorite mini-med insurance  with affordable premiums, freedom to choose providers, optional PPO discounts and guaranteed eligibility regardless of medical conditions.

Please support the Web sites that make publication of AskTony services possible.

Competitor Secure 12X3 STM

originally posted: 11/22/2006  reposted: 2/18/2011 This post has not been recently reviewed or revised by the author and may be out of date. If you notice an error or are in doubt, please send a new question by email or ask for an update. Email asktony@tonynovak.com.

Q: Thanks some good info. In any case I just took out a Secure STM Short Term Plan It states it is renewable, doesn't cover pre-existing, etc. But it is not the "Competitor Secure 12x3 STM" plan you mentioned. I went there to have a look and it "appeared" to me that it stated any conditions, (not pre-existing), that you may get during the course of the plan would be covered upon renewal. I was wondering if I was wrong there number one. And number two, what is the exact difference in their standard plan which states it is renewable every year? Three, would I have been better off with the plan you mentioned above? Essentially, I never saw the plan you mentioned by the same company, until today and was wondering if I should have taken that one out instead. By the way the reason I have the Short Term, is due to a pre-existing condition I can't get traditional insurance for. I'm 50 and I had angioplasty on my leg arteries to open them up in 1997 due to a congenital defect (not heart related), but all the insurance companies won't write me a policy as they consider it the same as heart angioplasty, which it isn't, but you can't fight them on it. I was always able to get insurance up until a few years ago, and now it appears all the companies have changed their underwriting criteria.

A: Yes, most health insurers tightened their eligibility criteria after the federally mandated HIPAA policies were in effect in each state. The intent is to push higher risk applicants into an assigned risk pool which, in turn, keeps the rates lower for the majority of applicants. In your case, it seems that the "Secure 12 x 3 STM" (36 month coverage insurance) is a better choice than a 6 month short term medical plan. This plan is being reintroduced in 23 states this month.

Summary

More resources:

Competitor Secure 12x3 STM secure pricing and enrollment